Global Warming: Good News for California Coast?

Four weeks ago in Southern California, Santa Ana winds threatened to
drive two fires in Simi Valley — the Porter Ranch and the Sesnon Fire —
on a path through the sun-baked hills towards the ocean. But instead of
building in strength and destructiveness, as the winds often have in
the past, the Santa Anas died down after a couple of days, much to the
relief of firefighters and homeowners in the area.

Could this diminution of wind be traced to global warming?

Climatologists
analyze massive sets of data gathered over decades of observation, so a
trend cannot cause a single weather event, in much the same way that
medical researchers can document the risk of smoking, but doctors
cannot link a patient’s lung cancer to a single cigarette. But
climatologists are developing a new understanding of the factors that
drive the Santa Anas, and a team of researchers at UCLA is reporting
evidence that global warming has already brought down the risk of the
most powerful of Santa Ana winds, which are perhaps the most dangerous
annual natural event in Southern California.

Although the paper
has yet to be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, Alex
Hall, research spokesman, said his team expects to see it accepted in a
prominent journal next year, and his team is scheduled to present their
results at the state of California’s annual climate change conference
next September.Bill Patzert

The
UCLA researchers are confident in their findings because the underlying
conditions that create the most powerful of Santa Ana winds have been
well documented both observationally and in equations. As these fall
and winter winds roar through mountain passes, in areas such as Simi
Valley, they are powered by a spillover effect from a huge dome of high
pressure air that builds up in the high desert area known as the Great
Basin, in eastern California, Nevada and Utah.

The vast
airflows are drawn to low-pressure areas to be found over the ocean off
the coast near Los Angeles, like water in a stream moving downhill.

But
it’s not just the difference in elevation and air pressure between the
high desert and the ocean that fuels these winds. “Temperature forcing”
also plays a crucial role, and as the land warms more quickly than in
the past, in the fall and early winter, this forcing loses some of its
power. With a physics calculation, Hall’s team finds that this factor
has fallen by about one-third, resulting in a slow but steady downtrend
in the most dangerous winds.

“This is not a small effect,” Hall
said. “It’s a well-known fact that the cool air that forms over the
desert at night is part of the Santa Ana condition, and so, as the
interior of California warms, the difference between the desert and the
ocean air pressures is reduced. That’s why we’re seeing fewer Santa Ana
conditions over Southern California, and why we should continue to see
fewer until the warming of the ocean catches up to the warming of the
land, which won’t be until sometime in the 22nd century.”

Ventura
County meteorologist Terry Schaeffer, who has been forecasting weather
for local farmers since l976, buys Hall’s argument, although he
cautions that the dataset may not be big enough to draw firm
conclusions yet.

“It does make sense, and I think California in
general is going to come out better than the desert southwest,” he
said. “In recent years, the Santa Anas have definitely been weaker, and
have been occurring later in the season. It’s a logical pattern, and
the data points in that direction, but it’s too soon to know for sure
yet.”

Hall points out that with this reduction of wildfire risk will come other changes that may not be so beneficial.

 “When
fires aren’t burning, which is most of the time, these winds bring
pleasant summer-like weather to the area, and they improve air quality
because they blow polluted air out over the ocean,” he said. “They also
play a role in maintaining the productivity of marine ecosystems in the
Southern California Bight by depositing mineral nutrients from the
desert to the ocean surface.  So I don’t view this as “good” or “bad”
news.”

Will global warming lead to cool coastal summers?

1030 Feat2Hall’s
team is preparing to present their results next year to a state-funded
scientific research group, the California Climate Change Research
Center, which hosts an annual conference. A paper presented at the
conference this year by a team led by Robert Bornstein at San Jose State, working with Prof. Jorge Gonzalez at Santa Clara, and grad student Bereket Lebassi, found solid evidence over the last 30 years that as the interior
of California warms more quickly in the summer, it pulls cool air from
the ocean inland more forcefully than in the past, resulting in
slightly cooler conditions along the coast.

This is another trend that is expected to strengthen.

“The
world is warming, but it’s not a uniform process, not like an oven,”
Bornstein said. “The warming will bring a redistribution of pressure
systems and wind patterns, and one of those secondary mechanisms will
be stronger sea breezes along the California coast in the summer.”

[Figure above: warming shown in red dots: cooling in blue dots. Note cooling in Bay Area.]

Bornstein
readily admits that this is not a new idea. Weather experts have long
known that the fogginess that develops along the California coast is
driven by a thermal low born of the heat that develops in the summer in
the San Joaquin and other interior valleys. As the winds circulate in a
huge wheel counterclockwise from the land over the ocean, they drag on
top of the ocean, bringing cold water from the ocean floor toward the
surface. The onshore winds pass over this cold upwelling, forming fog.
As the thermal low in the interior pulls the winds a little faster, the
process is intensified, resulting in increased fogginess, which has
already slightly dropped the maximum daytime temperature along the
coast in the summer by about 1 degree Fahrenheit per decade.

 “We
had a hunch that something like this was happening already,” Bornstein
said. “I’ve been showing graphs on this effect to my students for 15
years. But it wasn’t until we started mapping the temperature declines
that the pattern along the coast popped out.”

Bornstein believes
that the intensified sea breezes will push deeper into Ventura County
in the summer than in the past in areas below about 1,000 feet of
elevation, and has already documented this effect in the Bay Area and
in the Los Angeles basin.

Ventura county meteorologist Schaeffer finds this argument convincing as well.

 “We
haven’t had any really hot summers in years,” he said. “I can remember
years in the past when it was actually hotter in the summer along the
coast than in some inland areas like Piru.”

Bornstein’s paper has
been submitted to Climate, the most prestigious scientific journal in
the field, and has a good chance of being published in spring next
year, but already has stirred up excitement in the field. He is meeting
with state officials to work on new temperature estimate maps that he
believes will show a reduced need for air conditioning in coastal
cities such as Los Angeles, and a slowdown in the production of smog,
which thrives on high temperatures.

Smog levels already falling sharply in Ventura County

Due
to efforts to reduce emissions of smog-producing chemicals, Ventura
County, already in the last 15 years, has seen a steady decline in smog
levels. According to the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District,
which was founded in l968, last year the air in the county was the
cleanest ever in its recorded history. Despite doubling its population
over the last 35 years, the number of days in which the county as a
whole exceeded the Federal standards for lung-damaging ozone fell
almost to zero, when many years in the l970s it exceeded that standard
over 100 days a year.

“My primary concern has always been
ozone,” said Mike Villegas, air pollution control district official.
“Coastal areas such as Ventura and Oxnard have not exceeded the Federal
standards for some time, but in our inland valleys, such as the Ojai,
Conejo and Simi Valleys, it’s still an issue. One factor that drives
the ozone reaction is temperature, so a slight cooling would have a
modestly helpful effect.”

Bornstein’s team hasn’t looked
closely at the entire state of California, but estimates that the
slight cooling he has found in the Bay Area and in Los Angeles would be
seen elsewhere in the state in the areas in which the sea breezes
dominate the local climate. These are zones 22-24, according to the
climate maps produced by the University of California for Sunset
magazine, where the ocean influence prevails at least 85 percent of the
time, and include Oxnard, Ventura and Camarillo, but not Ojai, Simi
Valley or most of Moorpark.

Villegas is nonetheless confident
that air pollution in the county will continue to decline due to
ongoing efforts to reduce smog-producing emissions. As one example,
Villegas points to new Federal standards to reduce emissions from
oceangoing ships, which contribute a surprisingly high percentage of
the nitrogen oxides (NOX) that help make smog when heated in the air —
about 17 percent of the NOX found in Ventura County, according to his
estimates.

Some good news about temperature, but what about water?

To
climatologists, both these changes — the slightly cooler summers along
the California coast, and the reduction of the worst of the Santa Ana
winds — are considered local effects. Experts in the field stress that
the larger effects of global warming on a regional level may overwhelm
whatever good news it brings to a specific town.

Kevin
Trenberth, an internationally recognized expert who leads a research
team at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, and who testified
before Congress earlier this year on global warming, has a phrase for
the future of the American southwest — “the wets will get wetter and
the dries will get drier.”

In an interview, he explained that
“coastal regions may benefit from sea breezes, as they always have, but
will be hard hit by rising sea level, occasional storm surges and
erosion, perhaps associated with an El Niño event, and the rains can be
exceedingly hard when they do come, owing to more evaporation and water
vapor in the atmosphere.”

1030 Feat3Ventura
County has had a relatively quiet couple of years on the storm front,
but will not soon forget the devastating rains of January 2005,
considered the worst in decades, which severely damaged roads and
highways throughout the county, and contributed mightily to the deaths
of 10 people in La Conchita, buried under a collapsing cliff.

Kelly
Redmond of the Desert Research Institute in Reno, another highly
regarded climatologist, said in an interview that those storms were
“not inconsistent with” global warming, although he stressed that any
one storm cannot be attributed to an overall trend.                                                                                                                  

Redmond
agrees with Trenberth that the prospects for drought in the
Southwestern region are alarming — not for one reason, but for many
different reasons.

For one, most Californians depend on water
from the snowpack that builds up in the winter in the Sierra Nevada and
melts over the course of the spring and summer. Many climatological
studies have shown that as the planet warms, that snow will melt
faster. Worse, increasing amounts of precipitation in the mountains
will likely fall as rain, or as rain on snow. This could lead to
flooding in the spring, and water shortages in the long California
summers and falls.

Separately, climatologists have found a
long-term trend toward the cool dry La Niña pattern that tends to make
for drought. Even more troubling, scientists who study climates of the
past have found strong evidence of what they call “megadroughts”—
droughts lasting as long as 150 years, also linked to La Niña. Richard
Seager, who leads a research team at Columbia, published a paper in
Science magazine in 2005 arguing that a long-term drought has already
begun, and projecting that by 2050 the region as a whole will be as
drought-stricken as Oklahoma was in the Dust Bowl.

What to do?
Bill Patzert, the irreverent climatologist who works with NASA and is
widely considered the best forecaster in Southern California, argues
that the time has come to lessen stress on the system by reducing
population growth and immigration, but admits, “I’m the only one
talking about that.”

The answers, in other words, are still blowing in the wind.

The Bigness of Our Problems; the Smallness of Our Character

Christopher Caldwell is that rare bird: a truly thoughtful conservative. His most recent column for the Financial Times reminds us that whoever wins the election tonight will have a huge economic problem to solve, and that we as a people in the West are in poor condition psychologically to face it:

We should worry less about the bigness of our problems than about
the smallness of our character. We are out of practice at handling a
world of repossessed cars, hand-me-down clothes and canceled vacations
and graduation parties. For many decades, people were steeled against
recession by a knowledge that things could be a lot worse. Britain had
memories of postwar rationing. In the US, 8m people were unemployed
throughout the 1930s. Even people in their mid-40s may remember Edward
Heath’s three-day week and Jimmy Carter’s “malaise” speech.

Most
people, though, are too young to remember that stuff. Perhaps that is
why we are in the mess we are in. The US has not had a deep nationwide
recession since at least 1981-82. The present consumer pessimism has
not been equalled since December 1974, just after the Nixon
resignation, when the US was still reeling from the oil embargo and
President Ford was exhorting citizens to wear buttons that said “whip
inflation now”. The youngest Americans who can remember the difficulty
of paying for their children’s college education under such
circumstances are approaching 70.

The US is not the same
country it was the last time people had to tighten their belts. It has
changed socially, economically and demographically. The range of
problems has widened and the range of solutions has narrowed. Back in
the 1970s, there were relatively few people with credit cards and
hardly any who were “maxed out” on half a dozen. But the US now has
$2,600bn (€2,000bn, £1,600bn) in outstanding non-mortgage debt, and The
New York Times recently reported that 5.5 per cent of outstanding
credit card debt had been written off by card issuers as losses.
Indications are that the credit card problem in Britain is considerably
worse.

Many of the arrangements and institutions that got
Americans through the 1970s are gone. It is not often remembered how
socialistic the US was in those days. It was a disguised socialism,
administered by huge corporations, but it was socialism. The flabbiness
and misrule of American companies was a kind of insulation. No one
mentions it now, not even in the heat of an election campaign.
Republicans fear telling voters that things of value have indeed been
stripped from them in recent decades, just as Democrats warned.
Democrats fear telling voters that heavy-handed socialism is indeed
their ideal, just as Republicans warned.

Is offering a Federal extension of unemployment past thirteen weeks "heavy-handed socialism?"

And Now for Something Completely Nonpolitical…

From a fascinating book to come out in January 2009 by Roger Deakin, called Wildwood: A Journey Through Trees:

Two days into my first camp, on 26 April 1959, we heard the first cuckoo and entered it into the Tomes [his diaries]. Under the strong influence of Robert Frost, I was moved to write a beginner's poem about it, later published in the school magazine, a lament for the ousted fledglings. "Who'll never fidget, squeak or yawn/beneath the breast that is your pawn." I remember feeling whining poetry was somehow subversive of the objective, scientific approach [his naturalist friend] Goater encouraged us to adopt. Yet him himself was always so full of enthusiasm and passion for nature he could never hide his own strong emotional attachment in Beaulieu Road and its natural history. Later more of my Beaulieu scribblings appeared in the magazine, a Wordsworthian effort occasioned by my first encounter with a marsh gentian…not one of us was immune to the poetry of the place. One boy, Greystoke, who had only ever stayed in luxury hotels before, took to camping with all the zeal of the new convert and never missed an opportunity to rediscover his inner backwoodsman at Beaulieu. It was only much later that I realized the whole point about Beaulieu was that in teaching me to make connections, it was revealing the intimate kinship of ecology and poetry.

[pic of the Beaulieu Woods in the UK from skink74 via Flickr]

Beaulieuwoods

Could Bandwagon Effect Be Driving Obama’s Rise in the Polls?

Anyone with the slightest interest in the subject of polls this year has heard about The Bradley Effect, in which polls supposedly under-represented racist voters, so that black candidates were likely to fare more poorly than the polls indicated. My favorite statistical analyst, Nate Silver, argues cogently (here) that this effect did exist in particular circumstances in the past, but is misunderstood. He calls it "a persistent myth." He points out that Obama has actually outperformed his polling this year, for one.

But here's another factor that seemingly has been under-reported, perhaps because it's even harder to assess numerically. Anyone who has ever worked as a vendor knows intuitively about The Bandwagon Effect. It's simply, really. People are influenced by other people. If they see other people flocking to buy something, they will take a look themselves.

This is why baristas salt the tip jar with their own money. It's why movie studios use any possible excuse to trumpet "#1 Movie in America!" ads, no matter how little that phrase means numerically.

Social scientists say this effect holds true with polling too. A l994 study by two sociologists at the University of Kentucky found a statistically significant correlation:

Independents, which are those who do not vote based on the endorsement
of any party and are ultimately neutral, were influenced strongly in
favor of the person expected to win (Goidel and Shields 807-808).
Expectations played a significant role throughout the study. It was
found that independents are twice as likely to vote for the Republican
candidate when the Republican is expected to win. From the results, it
was also found that when the Democrat was expected to win, independent
Republicans and weak Republicans were more likely to vote for the
Democratic candidate (Goidel and Shields 808).

This study, which sadly appears not to be available on-line, can't be quickly boiled down to a quick percentage, especially since a well-designed poll should pick it up as election day approaches.

But one has to wonder: Could this be fueling Obama's recent rise in the Gallup poll? Or is it just statistical noise?

It's probably impossible to know, but hardened lefty Marc Cooper reports from Las Vegas, where the betting on numbers is serious business, that to put a (illicit) bet down on Obama, one has to bet a $1000 to win $100…and it's considered a slam-dunk win. One expert told Cooper that betting on anyone but Obama to win was considered "an absurd wager."

Mrnulxzape-lljb5t3tc0g

Will the Right Ever Get Tired of Blaming the Media?

From Eleanor Clift's article on "Wal-Mart Women" in Newsweek, in which she explains why under-$60,000 a year women will not (contrary to McCain's pollster) save his flailing campaign (see here).

What's shaping up is not comparable to '92, the last time a Democrat
won the White House. "It's much more serious and devastating to
Republicans," says Stan Greenberg, who was Bill Clinton's pollster.
Democrats lost seats in '92; Clinton had no coattails. Obama may enter
the White House with close to a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate
and a doubling of the Democratic margin in the House. This is a
watershed election. Typically, every four years, somebody wins,
somebody loses, and life goes on. But Obama represents generational
change that has huge political repercussions. He wins 63 percent of
voters between the ages of 18 and 29. For the Republicans, "It's not
just a lost election, it's a lost generation," says Greenberg.

Who
will they blame for this turn of events? "Overwhelmingly, it's you
guys," Greenburg told reporters at a Washington breakfast last week.
Republicans are convinced that media bias in favor of Obama tipped the
election in his favor, and that coverage of Sarah Palin has been
unfairly harsh, conveying sexism as well as anti-conservative bias
.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, always a GOP crowd pleaser, calls
the mainstream media "Pravda." Blaming the press may feel good. But it
won't solve the problem of a party that has lost its way.

Blame the media or blame themselves. Is it really any wonder they blame the media?

Barack Obama: A President Who Can Understand

In his recent appearance in Florida with Obama, Bill Clinton explains why he thinks Obama will be a good President, as only he can:

You know our current President said something that's really true.
The President is the decider-in-chief. And in this election you've got
a very unusual thing I've never seen happen before. You got to watch
the candidates make, not one, but two presidential decisions. You
always get one; who they pick as Vice President. He hit that one out of
the park, folks, that was a good decision.

OK, then you got to see the reaction to the financial crisis in
America nearly coming off the wheels. Having the wheels nearly run off.
I saw this up close. You know what he did? First he took a little heat
for not saying much.

I knew what he was doing. He talked to his advisers, he talked to my
economic advisers. He called Hillary. He called me. He called Warren
Buffett and he called Paul Volcker. He called all those people and you
know why, because he knew it was complicated and before he said
anything he wanted to understand.

Folks, if we have not learned anything, we have learned that we need
a president who wants to understand and who can understand. Who can
understand; yes, he can.

Now, wait a minute.

The second thing and this meant more to me than anything else and I
haven't cleared this with him. And he may even be mad at me for saying
this so closest to the election but I know what else he said to his
economic advisers. He said tell me what the right thing to do is.
What's the right thing for America, and don't tell me what's popular.
You tell me what's right and I'll figure out how to sell it. That's
what a president does in a crisis, what is right for America. And you
know after this election there are going to be a lot of rough times
ahead and you know it as well as I do. You have got to have a president
who can understand and then has the fortitude to stand up and tell you,
you hired me to win for America. I've got to make this decision now.
This is the very best I can do. And I'm prepared to be held accountable.

I'm going to tell you something the way he handled this crisis and
the way you saw him talk about it in the second and third debate showed
that he will be a very, very fine decision maker working for the
American people.

[pic from WonderfulTime on Flickr]

2987214496_9f93703070

The One-Stop Guide to Republican Politics

An anecdote from the campaign trail:

A Republican financial expert recalls attending a dinner with McCain
for the purpose of discussing with him domestic and international
financial complexities that clearly did not fascinate the senator. As
the dinner ended, McCain's question for his briefer was: "So, who is
the villain?"

from George Will's column today (here).

Alaska Politicians: Still Not Ready for Prime Time

From Don Young, Alaska's notorious anti-environmentalist, also facing corruption charges, a strangely guilt-ridden defense (via Roll Call) of his pal Ted Stevens after his conviction on seven counts:

“I can remember Richard Nixon, you know, his years of service, what
he’s done, and everybody [was] ridiculing him, and he ended up being
the greatest president in the history of our century. … The Senator
will be re-elected. He will appeal it. When he does go, he will win it
because there’s no way this is a jury of his peers.”

So Young told the Anchorage Daily News.

Amazing. If Richard Nixon was the greatest president in American history because he had to resign in disgrace, does that make Ted Stevens the greatest American senator, because he was convicted of taking kickbacks?

Just wondering.

Mr. October

Many have noted Barack Obama's cool, no-drama campaign style, but few have noticed how he resembles a professional athlete in his demeanor.

"I can get to the rim on anyone," he has reportedly said, a basketball phrase with a precise meaning. He doesn't claim to be the best; simply that he can score on anyone — repeatedly.

He doesn't get too "up" when his stats look good; he doesn't get too "down" on himself or his people and and panic when things aren't going well. He's level-headed, cool under pressure, like a great slugger.

Mr. October, courtesy of Steve Brodner and The New Yorker (here).

Mr. October Fin