Your Fine: $101 Million. Payable: Forever

Steven Emory Butcher, the man who while burning trash, set off the longest-burning wildfire in recorded California history, was sentenced Monday to 45 months in Federal prison and fined $101 million.

Butcher is not just homeless but mentally ill. It's easy to mock the absurdity of the fine,  but in a typically excellent Slate piece (here), Christopher Beam explains the logic.

How's a guy who sleeps in a tent supposed to pay $101 million?

He isn't. Instead, he's expected to pay a tiny bit every month until he
dies. The man, Steven Emory Butcher, currently receives $1,000 a month
in Supplemental Security Income, which is basically welfare for the
elderly, disabled, or blind. The federal court ordered that Butcher
would pay $25 to Los Padres National Forest four times a year while in
prison, and then $50 a month once he's released. No one expects him to
deliver the entire $101 million—even a spokesman for the prosecutor
acknowledged that the odds of Butcher paying it off were "extremely
slim"—but they do expect him to pay what he can.

It's possible to sympathize with a mentally ill man and yet still want to see him punished for the Day Fire, which burned for weeks on its way from I-5 to Ojai, consuming vast expanses of forest and chaparral on its way. (Not to mention the chaos and desperation of evacuations for yours truly and his family.) It's a shame for all of us, but I can't feel too sorry for Butcher, especially since he was fined for setting two fires in the forest within three years.

So why fine him so much? It's the law. A federal judge is required by statute
to make a defendant pay restitution when there's property damage
incurred, even if he doesn't have the money. The amount of the
restitution depends not on how much the criminal can afford to pay, but
how much property the victim lost, as determined by the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
For example, the 2006 fire set by Butcher cost Los Padres National
Forest more than $59 million in damages, plus fire suppression costs,
according to an assessment by the U.S. Forest Service.

Los Padres will not soon forget the Day Fire. It probably wishes it could forget Steven Emory Butcher. [pic from Fire Lookout via Flickr]

Dayfireaftermath

How You Feel When You Think of the Climate

As the ever-quotable Tom Friedman of the New York Times points out, Bush has left Obama with two ginormous deficits; one economic, the other related to climate. In an interview, Friedman said:

We basically did nothing for eight years, and in fairness to Bush we
didn't do much in the eight years previous, either, to mitigate climate
change. The tragedy is that we've got two deficits to overcome. We need
people to care about both of those deficits.

True. And it's tough just to pay attention. For those interested in this issue, I highly recommend an aggregation site called The Daily Climate, which does an excellent job of assembling the top twelve or so stories about climate every day, under categories such as "Solutions," "Consequences," "Causes," and so forth. It's a good site, and it's free…but it's not easy to face with your morning coffee.

Speaking of mornings…here's another way to look at the issue. The election was a dream, but now we wake up again to the chaos around us. Courtesy of the hard-working, gifted, and generous Steve Brodner of The New Yorker, among many other publications. 

Find more at his drawger page, here.

Wake Up Call sm

Tea Fire Burns Through Westmont College into Montecito

A fire started yesterday afternoon in Santa Barbara has already burned through Westmont College down into Montecito, consuming between 80-100 homes. Initial news reports are fragmentary but not reassuring, and the pictures are alarming. Here's a first-hand account from Ray Ford, of the Santa Barbara Independent, and a picture from a resident, Justin Fox, who lives just two miles south of the fire.

Power is out in much of the area; the Fire Department is urging residents to use as little water as possible…and a Santa Ana wind condition is expected today through Saturday in our area.

Teafire

Understatement of the Year

Well, it's almost December 2009, time to start considering some candidates for understatement of the year. Here's one from the veteran team at the McClatchey Newspapers:

Economic Summit Unlikely to Burnish Bush's Legacy

I thinking they're messing with us.

(To see the full pathetic story of the lame-duck Bush, go here. Pic from corps.man]

Bushsigningceremony

P.J. Cracks Back on the Right

Truly funny people can make you laugh (or at least, smile) even when they offend. P.J. O'Rourke is one of those people; horrendously wrong on numerous issues, but still funny. And this week he cracked back on his own beloved "conservative" movement, big time, in the Weekly Standard, in a piece poignantly termed We Blew It (here). He writes:

Let us bend over and kiss our ass goodbye. Our 28-year conservative
opportunity to fix the moral and practical boundaries of government is
gone–gone with the bear market and the Bear Stearns and the bear
that's headed off to do you-know-what in the woods on our philosophy.

An entire generation has been born, grown up, and had families of
its own since Ronald Reagan was elected. And where is the world we
promised these children of the Conservative Age? Where is this land of
freedom and responsibility, knowledge, opportunity, accomplishment,
honor, truth, trust, and one boring hour each week spent in itchy
clothes at church, synagogue, or mosque? It lies in ruins at our feet,
as well it might, since we ourselves kicked the shining city upon a
hill into dust and rubble.

Gotta admire any man that brutally honest with his own people.

What Lifts Us Out of Ourselves Helps Us Believe in the Future

Have been reading through a collection of short pieces by the great Rachel Carson, called Lost Woods: The Discovered Writings of Rachel Carson. Turns out Carson wrote the liner notes for a recording of Claude Debussy's La Mer, and subsequently was asked to give a talk on the connection between the arts and the natural world at a benefit for the National Orchestra in Washington, D.C. 

This was in the l950's, during the Korean War. She said:

I believe quite sincerely that in these difficult times we need more than ever to keep alive those arts from which men derive inspiration and courage and consolation — in a word, strength of spirit… When we contemplate the immense age of earth and sea, when we get in the frame of mind where we can speak easily of millions or billions of years, and when we remember the short time that hman life has existed on earth, we begin to see that some of the worries and tribulations that concern us are very minor. We also gain some sense of confidence that the changes and the evolution of new ways of life are natural and on the whole desirable.

It has come to me very clearly….that people everywhere are desperately eager for whatever will lift them out of themselves and allow them to believe in the future.

What lifts us out of ourselves, gives us strength. Words of wisdom, for yours truly as well…

Monsters in the Wilderness: the GOP Regroups

Paul Krugman is not just a Nobel Prize-winning economist. He's also a writer with real power and economy — one of the best columnists in the country. Here's an example, from a Wednesday post:

….for the past 14 years America’s
political life has been largely dominated by, well, monsters. Monsters
like Tom DeLay, who suggested that the shootings at Columbine happened
because schools teach students the theory of evolution. Monsters like
Karl Rove, who declared that liberals wanted to offer “therapy and
understanding” to terrorists. Monsters like Dick Cheney, who saw 9/11
as an opportunity to start torturing people.

And in our national discourse, we pretended that these monsters were
reasonable, respectable people. To point out that the monsters were, in
fact, monsters, was “shrill.”

Four years ago it seemed as if the monsters would dominate American
politics for a long time to come. But for now, at least, they’ve been
banished to the wilderness.

And here's a sketch from Toles, on what those monsters look like:

GOPmonster

The End of Something Old, the Start of Something New

David Brooks, I owe you an apology. After your fervent support for the misguided and mismanaged war in Iraq, I thought you had become a neocon. Your seemingly mindless support of the re-election of Bush in 2004 was the final straw for me.

But perhaps I spoke too soon. Since 2005, Brooks has been expressing serious doubts about W., as illustrated best in this remark on Meet the Press from September 2005, shortly after Katrina:

I say that…you always [have] got to go back to competence. And sometimes in
my dark moments, I think [Bush] is "The Manchurian Candidate" designed to
discredit all the ideas I believe in. And so he has to follow through
on that [speech in New Orleans]. That's the crucial thing for the next two years for him.

Not really, of course. Bush's long-forgotten speech in New Orleans led to nothing of great substance except FEMA money (that would have been available in any case). But this remark from Brooks did lead to a little-noticed shift in his rhetoric. Although he never officially declared his support for Obama, Brooks this year hinted that he found Obama a better candidate than McCain, and, more importantly for yours truly, on Monday published a truly remarkable column that marked the end of one era and the beginning of another, for yours truly as well as for the nation. Brooks wrote:

Economically, [this election] marks the end of the Long Boom, which began in 1983.
Politically, it probably marks the end of conservative dominance, which
began in 1980. Generationally, it marks the end of baby boomer
supremacy, which began in 1968.

And for me, it marked the end of my career at Paramount Pictures as a story analyst. A secure income and a steady job — those days are gone, at least for a while. Here comes the free-lance life. But I'm not panicked about it, and suspect the timing might be right. At least I'll have company.

Raised in prosperity, favored by genetics, these young meritocrats [who support Obama] will
have to govern in a period when the demands on the nation’s wealth
outstrip the supply. They will grapple with the growing burdens of an
aging society, rising health care costs and high energy prices. They
will have to make up for the trillion-plus dollars the government will
spend to avoid a deep recession. They will have to struggle to keep
their promises to cut taxes, create an energy revolution, pass an
expensive health care plan and all the rest… We’re probably entering a period, in other words, in which smart young
liberals meet a stone-cold scarcity that they do not seem to recognize
or have a plan for.

It's funny: I have less money, but more belief in my country than ever. I view with equanimity the coming fall…and see its beauty. [pic of a favorite tree to come soon…]

Global Warming: Good News for California Coast?

Four weeks ago in Southern California, Santa Ana winds threatened to
drive two fires in Simi Valley — the Porter Ranch and the Sesnon Fire —
on a path through the sun-baked hills towards the ocean. But instead of
building in strength and destructiveness, as the winds often have in
the past, the Santa Anas died down after a couple of days, much to the
relief of firefighters and homeowners in the area.

Could this diminution of wind be traced to global warming?

Climatologists
analyze massive sets of data gathered over decades of observation, so a
trend cannot cause a single weather event, in much the same way that
medical researchers can document the risk of smoking, but doctors
cannot link a patient’s lung cancer to a single cigarette. But
climatologists are developing a new understanding of the factors that
drive the Santa Anas, and a team of researchers at UCLA is reporting
evidence that global warming has already brought down the risk of the
most powerful of Santa Ana winds, which are perhaps the most dangerous
annual natural event in Southern California.

Although the paper
has yet to be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, Alex
Hall, research spokesman, said his team expects to see it accepted in a
prominent journal next year, and his team is scheduled to present their
results at the state of California’s annual climate change conference
next September.Bill Patzert

The
UCLA researchers are confident in their findings because the underlying
conditions that create the most powerful of Santa Ana winds have been
well documented both observationally and in equations. As these fall
and winter winds roar through mountain passes, in areas such as Simi
Valley, they are powered by a spillover effect from a huge dome of high
pressure air that builds up in the high desert area known as the Great
Basin, in eastern California, Nevada and Utah.

The vast
airflows are drawn to low-pressure areas to be found over the ocean off
the coast near Los Angeles, like water in a stream moving downhill.

But
it’s not just the difference in elevation and air pressure between the
high desert and the ocean that fuels these winds. “Temperature forcing”
also plays a crucial role, and as the land warms more quickly than in
the past, in the fall and early winter, this forcing loses some of its
power. With a physics calculation, Hall’s team finds that this factor
has fallen by about one-third, resulting in a slow but steady downtrend
in the most dangerous winds.

“This is not a small effect,” Hall
said. “It’s a well-known fact that the cool air that forms over the
desert at night is part of the Santa Ana condition, and so, as the
interior of California warms, the difference between the desert and the
ocean air pressures is reduced. That’s why we’re seeing fewer Santa Ana
conditions over Southern California, and why we should continue to see
fewer until the warming of the ocean catches up to the warming of the
land, which won’t be until sometime in the 22nd century.”

Ventura
County meteorologist Terry Schaeffer, who has been forecasting weather
for local farmers since l976, buys Hall’s argument, although he
cautions that the dataset may not be big enough to draw firm
conclusions yet.

“It does make sense, and I think California in
general is going to come out better than the desert southwest,” he
said. “In recent years, the Santa Anas have definitely been weaker, and
have been occurring later in the season. It’s a logical pattern, and
the data points in that direction, but it’s too soon to know for sure
yet.”

Hall points out that with this reduction of wildfire risk will come other changes that may not be so beneficial.

 “When
fires aren’t burning, which is most of the time, these winds bring
pleasant summer-like weather to the area, and they improve air quality
because they blow polluted air out over the ocean,” he said. “They also
play a role in maintaining the productivity of marine ecosystems in the
Southern California Bight by depositing mineral nutrients from the
desert to the ocean surface.  So I don’t view this as “good” or “bad”
news.”

Will global warming lead to cool coastal summers?

1030 Feat2Hall’s
team is preparing to present their results next year to a state-funded
scientific research group, the California Climate Change Research
Center, which hosts an annual conference. A paper presented at the
conference this year by a team led by Robert Bornstein at San Jose State, working with Prof. Jorge Gonzalez at Santa Clara, and grad student Bereket Lebassi, found solid evidence over the last 30 years that as the interior
of California warms more quickly in the summer, it pulls cool air from
the ocean inland more forcefully than in the past, resulting in
slightly cooler conditions along the coast.

This is another trend that is expected to strengthen.

“The
world is warming, but it’s not a uniform process, not like an oven,”
Bornstein said. “The warming will bring a redistribution of pressure
systems and wind patterns, and one of those secondary mechanisms will
be stronger sea breezes along the California coast in the summer.”

[Figure above: warming shown in red dots: cooling in blue dots. Note cooling in Bay Area.]

Bornstein
readily admits that this is not a new idea. Weather experts have long
known that the fogginess that develops along the California coast is
driven by a thermal low born of the heat that develops in the summer in
the San Joaquin and other interior valleys. As the winds circulate in a
huge wheel counterclockwise from the land over the ocean, they drag on
top of the ocean, bringing cold water from the ocean floor toward the
surface. The onshore winds pass over this cold upwelling, forming fog.
As the thermal low in the interior pulls the winds a little faster, the
process is intensified, resulting in increased fogginess, which has
already slightly dropped the maximum daytime temperature along the
coast in the summer by about 1 degree Fahrenheit per decade.

 “We
had a hunch that something like this was happening already,” Bornstein
said. “I’ve been showing graphs on this effect to my students for 15
years. But it wasn’t until we started mapping the temperature declines
that the pattern along the coast popped out.”

Bornstein believes
that the intensified sea breezes will push deeper into Ventura County
in the summer than in the past in areas below about 1,000 feet of
elevation, and has already documented this effect in the Bay Area and
in the Los Angeles basin.

Ventura county meteorologist Schaeffer finds this argument convincing as well.

 “We
haven’t had any really hot summers in years,” he said. “I can remember
years in the past when it was actually hotter in the summer along the
coast than in some inland areas like Piru.”

Bornstein’s paper has
been submitted to Climate, the most prestigious scientific journal in
the field, and has a good chance of being published in spring next
year, but already has stirred up excitement in the field. He is meeting
with state officials to work on new temperature estimate maps that he
believes will show a reduced need for air conditioning in coastal
cities such as Los Angeles, and a slowdown in the production of smog,
which thrives on high temperatures.

Smog levels already falling sharply in Ventura County

Due
to efforts to reduce emissions of smog-producing chemicals, Ventura
County, already in the last 15 years, has seen a steady decline in smog
levels. According to the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District,
which was founded in l968, last year the air in the county was the
cleanest ever in its recorded history. Despite doubling its population
over the last 35 years, the number of days in which the county as a
whole exceeded the Federal standards for lung-damaging ozone fell
almost to zero, when many years in the l970s it exceeded that standard
over 100 days a year.

“My primary concern has always been
ozone,” said Mike Villegas, air pollution control district official.
“Coastal areas such as Ventura and Oxnard have not exceeded the Federal
standards for some time, but in our inland valleys, such as the Ojai,
Conejo and Simi Valleys, it’s still an issue. One factor that drives
the ozone reaction is temperature, so a slight cooling would have a
modestly helpful effect.”

Bornstein’s team hasn’t looked
closely at the entire state of California, but estimates that the
slight cooling he has found in the Bay Area and in Los Angeles would be
seen elsewhere in the state in the areas in which the sea breezes
dominate the local climate. These are zones 22-24, according to the
climate maps produced by the University of California for Sunset
magazine, where the ocean influence prevails at least 85 percent of the
time, and include Oxnard, Ventura and Camarillo, but not Ojai, Simi
Valley or most of Moorpark.

Villegas is nonetheless confident
that air pollution in the county will continue to decline due to
ongoing efforts to reduce smog-producing emissions. As one example,
Villegas points to new Federal standards to reduce emissions from
oceangoing ships, which contribute a surprisingly high percentage of
the nitrogen oxides (NOX) that help make smog when heated in the air —
about 17 percent of the NOX found in Ventura County, according to his
estimates.

Some good news about temperature, but what about water?

To
climatologists, both these changes — the slightly cooler summers along
the California coast, and the reduction of the worst of the Santa Ana
winds — are considered local effects. Experts in the field stress that
the larger effects of global warming on a regional level may overwhelm
whatever good news it brings to a specific town.

Kevin
Trenberth, an internationally recognized expert who leads a research
team at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, and who testified
before Congress earlier this year on global warming, has a phrase for
the future of the American southwest — “the wets will get wetter and
the dries will get drier.”

In an interview, he explained that
“coastal regions may benefit from sea breezes, as they always have, but
will be hard hit by rising sea level, occasional storm surges and
erosion, perhaps associated with an El Niño event, and the rains can be
exceedingly hard when they do come, owing to more evaporation and water
vapor in the atmosphere.”

1030 Feat3Ventura
County has had a relatively quiet couple of years on the storm front,
but will not soon forget the devastating rains of January 2005,
considered the worst in decades, which severely damaged roads and
highways throughout the county, and contributed mightily to the deaths
of 10 people in La Conchita, buried under a collapsing cliff.

Kelly
Redmond of the Desert Research Institute in Reno, another highly
regarded climatologist, said in an interview that those storms were
“not inconsistent with” global warming, although he stressed that any
one storm cannot be attributed to an overall trend.                                                                                                                  

Redmond
agrees with Trenberth that the prospects for drought in the
Southwestern region are alarming — not for one reason, but for many
different reasons.

For one, most Californians depend on water
from the snowpack that builds up in the winter in the Sierra Nevada and
melts over the course of the spring and summer. Many climatological
studies have shown that as the planet warms, that snow will melt
faster. Worse, increasing amounts of precipitation in the mountains
will likely fall as rain, or as rain on snow. This could lead to
flooding in the spring, and water shortages in the long California
summers and falls.

Separately, climatologists have found a
long-term trend toward the cool dry La Niña pattern that tends to make
for drought. Even more troubling, scientists who study climates of the
past have found strong evidence of what they call “megadroughts”—
droughts lasting as long as 150 years, also linked to La Niña. Richard
Seager, who leads a research team at Columbia, published a paper in
Science magazine in 2005 arguing that a long-term drought has already
begun, and projecting that by 2050 the region as a whole will be as
drought-stricken as Oklahoma was in the Dust Bowl.

What to do?
Bill Patzert, the irreverent climatologist who works with NASA and is
widely considered the best forecaster in Southern California, argues
that the time has come to lessen stress on the system by reducing
population growth and immigration, but admits, “I’m the only one
talking about that.”

The answers, in other words, are still blowing in the wind.